Strategies
Home Up

Strategies for Increasing Student Motivation

"Our students vary significantly in academic abilities and interests and attitudes toward work and authority.  Few students have the capacity for self-reinforcement" (Lowman, 1990* in Eddington and Hunt 17). 

Nevertheless, students are motivated by a variety of factors, such as interest in a subject, seeing the relevance or uses of a subject, a wish for achievement, con fidence, "patience and persistence," as well as desire for approval and even the desire to overcome a challenge (Davis 193).

"The most a teacher can do is to create the circumstances that influence students to want to learn" (17) especially in required courses.

"Some of your students may have never experienced academic success, some may have learning disabilities, some may suffer test anxiety, some may be divergent thinkers, and some may have had embarrassing or humiliating classroom experiences" (17-18).

"Most students respond positively to a well-organized course taught by an enthusiastic instructor who has a genuine interest in students and what they learn" (Davis 194).

v     Introductory Letter:  Ask students to tell about themselves, what they expect out of the course and you as a teacher (goals and behaviors, not grades), and ask what you can do to make the learning easier or more comfortable (methods, not work loads).

v     Train Students to Take Your Course: What exactly do they need to succeed in your course?  Make the first week a "learning week," as Barbara Glenn (JSRCC, English) calls it.  During the course, instead of pointing out to students that they are "way behind," point to ways they can learn and offer help (Davis 195).

v     Reading: Find out who has textbooks, or give students clear reasons to use the course text, e.g. study questions to answer for a chapter, perhaps for a grade or perhaps because a section of the next exam will be based on those questions

o       "Survival Cards": J. W. Daniel reports ("Survival Cards in Math." College Teaching 1988, 36.3: 110) getting 90 percent of students to read instead of 10 percent by having students submit at the beginning of each class a 3" x 5" card with highlights from the day's reading--outline, definitions, etc., which he collects and stamps.  Cards are returned just before review for the test, during which students can add to each card but not add more cards.  Cards are collected by the teacher and passed back at the test for use as aids in taking the test.

o       "One-Word Journal": Thomas Angelo has students state a word characterizing the reading for the day and jot down a brief (less than a page) explanation to justify the characterization.

o       "One-Sentence Journal":  Ericksen and Strommer (Teaching College Freshmen.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991) vary this method by suggesting that you ask students to write one detailed in answer to a question you have about the reading and to list 3 bits of supporting evidence--such as quoting from the reading, citing facts or figures, noting experts quoted, etc.

o       "Critical Reading Questionnaire":  Either one-by-one or as a poll for a reading, ask students to respond to questions such as these:

§         Can you give me one or two items from the chapter that seem important?

§         What section of the reading do you think we should review?

§         What in the reading surprised you?

§         What topics in the reading can you apply to your own experience? (Davis 200) (See also: "When They Don't Do the Reading." Teaching Professor, 1989, 3.10: 3-4.)

v     Emphasize Mastery and Learning Rather Than Grades:

o       Show students an old exam question or two, sample answers, and get them to indicate which answers are superior and why.

o       Instead of grading all homework--especially with zeroes--encourage student effort by asking for a reasonable effort, plus bringing in questions about tasks or problems they could not complete or study questions that were unusually challenging for them.  (A study by Ames and Ames suggested that grading everything puts students' egos on the line, so some will simply not submit homework rather than risk a low evaluation.  The "try it for 30 minutes" class was attempting to learn and seeing the trial and error involved.  That teacher also counted the homework as a smaller part of the grade--and got more turned in.) (Davis 197)  

v     Fair Exams:  Avoid the tricky, overly long, and infrequent exams. Consider alternative and frequent assessments--portfolios, essays, collaborative or group quizzes or tests, partly take-home, student-made tests and study guides, with mastery learning options (Eddington and Hunt 18).  Tests--all tasks--should require the kind of thinking you want students to exhibit, not a default term-and-definition rote (Davis 197-198).

v     Respond to Tests/Assignments Quickly and Informatively: Students need to know how to do better, either for revising or retesting on the current assignment or for the next one.  They also should know how well they have done compared to your standard or each other (or both).  Provide positive feedback and "recognize sincere effort"; for attempts that fall short, indicate your belief that students can improve with enough time on task (Davis 198).

v     Use Rewards, Not Punishment:  Instead of subtracting from grades for absences and late work, give instructive feedback--even on ungraded practices--and note during the course how much students have advanced to demonstrate that you are on their side (Eddington and Hunt 19, Davis 197). 

v     Show successful work in ways like these:

o       For assignments you've used before, note thesis statements that have been successfully defended in the past, e.g. for research tasks or exam essays. 

o       Perhaps permission the best writing to show it in other sections or later semesters. 

o       Get students to read, even write a critique, of each other's essays, lab reports, field reports, etc., (Davis 198) especially if your criteria are clear or even developed with the students.

v     Emphasize Progress and Self-Review:  Especially when students get upset about a grade, get them to take stock of what they have learned, see their strengths, and target their weaknesses (Davis 195).  Of course, that's hard to do if you only give 2-3 tests for the entire course grade, so scale out more frequent assessments, including quizzes and papers, maybe presentations, group tasks, and even informal assessments, such as an occasional one-minute paper (on the day's clearest or muddiest point, collected anonymously).

v     Use Cooperative and Group Learning Methods:  Decreasing individual risk helps promote intrinsic motivation; so does giving students some say in the formation of the schedule of assignments.

v     Find out a discussable fact for each student in addition to a name: Other class atmosphere methods include study buddies, pointing out uses of course concepts, making expectations clear, and looking to student comfort with movable seats (20-21) and activating the low-state bid ventilation vs. the low-state bid sound suppression system (opening the classroom door for air or closing it for quiet and privacy).

v     Praise encourages; routine suppresses motivation: Other methods include students teaching, avoiding grading curves (a quota for A's and B's) and keeping up your own enthusiasm, keeping tests focused on the course objectives and mainstream information and at a challenging but realistic level that recognizes the level students have upon entering the course, pacing the course [and the help] appropriately (21-22).

v     Increase students' intrinsic motivation:  "Frequent, early, positive feedback" and providing opportunities that are sufficiently challenging but not over students' heads are as important as helping students see personal meaning in the subject, creating an open and positive learning environment, and establishing a sense of community (Davis 193).

v     "Don't tell students something when you can ask them."  Active participation requires students to do, make, write, design something, to solve a problem, to test ideas against perceptions of their peers.  In particular, replicate E. J. Sass's 1989 study, "Motivation in the Classroom: What Students Tell Us" (Teaching of Psychology, 1989, 16.2:86-88), by asking your students to recall two recent classes, one motivating, one not so, and list specific traits of each.  Students should group to combine lists, but they will probably note that motivation springs from an enthusiastic instructor, relevant material, an organized course, appropriately challenging tasks and content, active involvement, variety, rapport, and concrete, understandable examples (Davis 194-195).

* Lowman, J. "Promoting Motivation and Learning." College Teaching, 1990, 38.4: 136-139.

Sources: Barbara Gross Davis, Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993. "Motivating Students": 193-204.

Susan Eddington and Cathy Hunt, Teaching Consultation Process SOURCEBOOK. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, 1996. "Motivation": 17-25.

 

Copyright3.gif (24311 bytes) 1999-2008+ by the Virginia Community College System. Prepared for the VCCS by Professor Eric Hibbison, 1998-2001 MRCTE Chair and Chief Chair of RCTE from  2000-2005. Permission is granted to use this content for professional development or other educational, nonprofit purposes.  Animations used on this site are either part of the Front Page theme or from a royalty free collection called "Web Clip Empire 250,000" ©1997, 1998 by Xoom, Inc., and its Licensors.  

Reminder for folks new to the Web: UNDERLINED WORDS (and some graphics images) ARE HOT LINKS. To preview them, hold your mouse on the hotlink (the arrow becomes a hand as you "mouseover" a link) and read the "URL" (Web address) in the "status line" (bottom) of your maximized Web browser. To visit, just click.